I found this course to be very interesting and well worth taking. I learned a variety of new concepts that I can carry on with me throughout my academic years. I enjoyed doing this blog because I was able to elaborate on course material with my own input as well as using the texts. Like I discussed in my first entry, this is the first time that I ever had to keep a online blog for a class and I feel that I was able to express myself more. Also, I like the fact of trying something new and out of the usual academic writing.
There was a ton of vocabulary and concepts that I learned which I will most definitely use in my higher level sociology classes. One of which include the “obvious” concept explained by Peter Berger. According to Berger, the obvious is the “1st wisdom of sociology.” This term refers to how things are not what how they seem. The first step in analyzing and examining is to realize what “seems” to be “obvious.” In reality especially social reality; there are several layers of meaning and with each layer there are new perceptions and notions created by individuals. The whole idea of the “obvious” coincides with the term “debunking.” Debunking can refer to looking at the obvious and less-obvious to understand social behavior. These two terms are about unfolding and unwrapping the hidden truths and trying to understand as well as grasp a better idea of what certain things mean in life.The obvious is important reason being, we can not just look at the surface, there is more to it and we can not take anything for granted.
The concept of “obvious” has furthered my understanding of sociology as a whole. I am much more aware of how I interpret certain ideas and thoughts. I find myself debunking quite a bit; it has even carried on already into my other courses. This has helped me a lot by looking at everything from different points of view and not just going in with my own interpretations. This class has taught me that when looking at something from one angle we are not getting the entire truth, therefore I have to realize things are not what they seem as Berger suggests and I must take the time to look at opposing views.
When we learned about the “mean world syndrome”, I never heard this concept before and I was quite intregued to learn what it meant. When the media bombards us with disastrous and negative issues and does not focus on anything positive, people can be scared of the world. However, when learning about this in class, it is actually the media who makes people scared. They do this by pointing out the worse and really its only miniscule to the actual good news that is available. The media highlight terrible events and make it the only center of attention when really people should not be frightened of the world and understand not all is bad out there. By watching too much television news or hearing the radio can make one afraid. Not to say that all news is bad, however this is where the “obvious” can take place. “THINGS ARE NOT WHAT THEY SEEM!” I feel that these two ideas connect because people see these terrible occurrences around the world and take it as that. Whereas, society needs to understand that the media wants us to think a certain way to fit their agenda.